Technical Bulletin of 22 April 2000

Tommy Thompson wrote:

>> So let us look at squirrels. I have had the chance to go over most of
>> what has appeared on the internet and I am a very fast reader.
> Assuming you have perused lightlink archives, and as well fza postings.
> Notice any squirrels there? And by the way, why us squirrels? One day
>you break your leg, and next you post lrh style, but to the FZ. ??????
> Why here? Assuredly you set up previous code sequences to be
>transmitted to those in power upon your return to establish your
>idenity.

The only code sequences I have are those to a couple of banks accounts.
They will know who I am.

>> Clear has no harmonics. It is also not a stable state. When I issued
>> the OT2 materials I stated that Clear was not stable. The stability
>> of the state of Clear depends of how much charge has come of the
>> upper dynamic banks.  There is a personal and a group aspect to these
>> banks.
> This is understood. However, there is very little if no tech issued
>about these upper dynamic banks. You mentioned them here and there, but
>the Ot Sections to this point do not lead in this direction.
> Most of it seems to come from CBR, Ralph, Pilot, and a few others. (no
>insult to anyone is intended by non-inclusion here).

There are a few processes that reach in that direction. The conditions and exchange by dynamics clears locks off when properly done. The Ser Fac X Dynamics rundown in XDN was intended to blow the top of those banks. Quite a few cracked open the OT bands on XDN but ran into the liabilities of Dianetics. Super Power is an OT9 available at the level of Clear - it bypasses the entity cases. The ERL clears off the principle incidents that hold one into the GPM matrices. There are a few other rundowns to stabilize someone in present time. The Clear has to be brought up from a no-condition below confusion to a recognition of Sources on all dynamics. Each of the dynamics is examined from the viewpoint of each other dynamics.

>> I think that few will remember the lecture where I talked
>> about that lifetime. It is not available in the FZ.
>
> Plausable. Can you post a synopsis of the lecture?

Its history and not too relevant.

>> >What are your considerations on us who have left the CofS, and who
>> >are struggling to get up the bridge, all alone and in timbuktoo! Do
>> >you expect us to go back to the CofS?
>>
>> No. Do as you will. Create your own organizations. One thing I can
>> promise is that the journey through the upper levels is hard and you
>> will need friends whom you can trust absolutely.
>>
> How many friends. What would you say the smallest group size would be
>that would be stable enough to push everyone through it?

If you put together a group of 10 or so and get them through OT8 and the BC then you are probably in a position to hold together a local scene. At least a few will need the OEC as well. On a planetary level 1000 organized and trained OT8s.

> What ethics repair list? One you have previously issued? Of course L10
>style should be run on clears. How did you know that? What are the
>liabilites of not using that style?

I’ll re-issue an ERL soon with more data.

> Is there a current program internally in cos to get this list in on all
>staff? or all clear staff?

Not that is currently active.

>> I think you will see the changes as Super Power is released. Within a
>> couple of years after that the impact on the society will be such as
>> to make the release of OT9 and OT10 possible.
> As is released? It is not now in the orgs? It is a hell of a rundown,
>from what I have seen.
>
> Somewhere you mentioned it was incomplete. How about posting a complete
>rundown?

Who would deliver it? It needs stable groups for delivery not a few loners.

> So the otviii we have, perhaps with superstatic from cbr would clean
>one up enough to run 9??

Bill’s “Super-Static” material falls off the GPMs - its just locks on top.

> What about the "disagreed LRH VIII" docs?

YHBT.

> How about a quick upper bridge chart?

The approach to what is above OT10 won’t really be mappable until we have a few up the line.

>> OT10 and up is auditing from Godhood but in order to be a God one
>> must also be willing to view from the position of the slaves one
>> created.
> Is not Handbook for Preclears handling this very thing? Is there not a
>way to solo a lot of the charge off across the dynamics, from the
>viewpoint of the dynamic being handled?  Too much "bootstrap"?

HFP is another way of getting at the locks.
 

>When is that? Whats missing from super power? What in the hell do we
>have?

I think you have a version written up by someone who blew NWC 20 years ago.

>> I feel that the Ethics Repair List should be available generally and
>> will write it up for general use in the next few days. The version
>> that was posted a while back is very incorrect.
> Hope you are not talking about my humble efforts to assemble a repair
>list for people out of the cos?

No. One was posted in 97 by Zenon Panoussis - probably from a group in Oregon.

>> The Super Power
>> posted is only a fraction of the original. It looks like something
>> out of the first test rundowns.
> So how did we get it? what fraction? What happened after the testing?

Quite a few changes. The FPRD came out of it. KTL and LOC fit in there.

Robert wrote:

>I've mentioned some of these things in the past, but this time perhaps "LRH
>II" would care to comment on some of these points.
>
>I believe:
>
>• That the splitup of the church was not accidental, that a free zone was
>planned and intended as a way of keeping the tech alive and growing.

No. It was a sort of inevitable. NOTs was (and is) incomplete and many cases were bypassed from this.
The material that was developed by Bill Robertson will need to be incorporated in parts particularly what he termed “Excalibur”.

>• That LRH put the church on automatic pilot as far as management was
>concerned since 1965, as if giving it the command "Survive!" as mentioned in
>his early works.  I believe he did this in order to give the church about 20
>years to learn to run on its own.

I never wanted to manage the Church. I tried to get out of management back in the sixties but kept getting pulled back in to handle situations that threatened the existence of Scientology.

>• That LRH put much of the tech on automatic pilot since that point too,
>giving general orders (like "make it all 4 flows", "consolidate the tech
>into grades and rundowns" "here's a basic tech idea, now go develop it to
>its end result", etc.)  but not getting much into the details.

I wanted a bridge that could mostly be run by technicians rather than masters. There just weren’t the number of staff around who could think with the tech and make it there own.

>• That the poor management tactics and rampant stupid blunders that caused
>orgs to get a bad reputation and stats to crash were part of a scheme to
>keep the church from growing too powerful and all-consuming, as the one LRH
>mentioned in his pulp fiction story "One Was Stubborn".

No. They were just stupidity.

>• That the unrelenting rise in prices of the late 70's, the use of terms
>like "finance dictator" and "finance police", the destruction and takeover
>of highly successful and profitable missions in 1982, were all part of an
>elaborate effort to force a free zone into existence by creating a mass
>exodus.

No.

>• That LRH's body died in 1982 or thereabouts and his body was kept "on ice"
>for the purpose of providing fingerprints for legal purposes.
>
>• That the official date of death in Feb 1986 was predetermined years in
>advance.

I’d be a little older if that were the case.

>• That LRH held back on some of the upper level tech partly for strategic
>purposes, partly because it wasn't worked out completely enough.

Pilots had unstable results.

>• That the entirety of NOTs was meant to be a stabilizer of the clear state
>rather than to enhance OT abilities.

Yes. It was meant as a repair action, not a major level. Then it opened up more areas.

>• That the old OT levels were cut out because there was no tech (like for
>handling GPMs) to handle upper level phenomena turned on by the processes,
>or to stabilize the states attained with these levels.

The old OT4 was kicking in NOTs too heavily. For many OT5 and OT6 were run at a dub-in level. Few stayed stable.

>• That many of the bad physical and emotional cases from the period after
>the breakup (cancer, chronic fatigue, depression, etc.) were a direct result
>of that third dynamic engram and could not be audited out successfully
>because dianetics had been denied to upper level cases.

Not Dianetics as it is. Dianetics by Dynamics would be a closer statement. But even that would be a repair action. Getting at the principle valences locked up in the upper dynamics pulls apart the engrams at a much more basic level.

>• That the LRH being is from a group of stars called the Pleades along with
>others like him, who have found the way to transcend the physical and want
>to spread their knowledge to other parts of the universe.

The Pleiadeans are a group of beings who remained outside this universe until recently. There are quite a few other such groups. They sometimes get into one’s space on NOTs. While they have a wider view than most on Earth they lack experiential track and tend toward impracticalities.

*******

There were quite a few other posts with various similar questions so I’ll take up a few of the points:

The major situation in the FZ is not counter-intention from the orgs or RTC or OSA. It is laziness, out-ethics, lower conditions on the dynamics and misunderstoods. There are exceptions but the general activity level in most areas just isn’t enough to hold together a stable group.

There is counter-intention and other intention as one goes up the road. The antagonistism toward Scientology over the years stems from case factors in place for millennia. We’re blowing peoples’ vested interests apart at a level that resonates deep in their thetan bones. They fight it. I blamed problems on the press and the psychiatrists and the governments. Well, that was my case. You have your own 3rd and 4th dynamic ser facs and the opposition from the Church is part and parcel of it. Its old games with the same terminals and opterms across the dynamics.

When you have your groups of 10+ through the BC and OT8 then you’ll have the upper levels. They’ll be staring you in the face.

As Heidrun Beer has mentioned there is a linking of theta at the higher levels. The power of these levels breaks through any barriers of confidentiality. In various forms it will re-appear across the planet through various groups and avenues.

The FZBA in Russia and elsewhere seem to have their act together in getting the materials out but it looks like the work of a small number. How about a Freezone org the size of old St. Hill! Is that within the bounds of achievability?

Well there’s still a fair few points outstanding but I’ll call it a day for now. I should have the ERL ready for you on Tuesday.

Love,

Ron