Technical Bulletin of 7 June 2000 Issue II

thomlove wrote:

>A question has come up, for me anyway, on exactly what you'd like to
>have come back to you in the way of input from pcs as part of the
>research line.
>
>I suspect an ARF, fully and completely done, as per the issue,  would
>suffice, but are there any specific lines of questions you want the
>auditor and/or pc to put attention on that would help you figure out
>what is what?

I don’t actually want to be involved in the day to day C/Sing of auditing as that would, at this time, be an administrative overload.

Given existing circumstances I would prefer a summary. If there are problems with a particular R/D or PC then I might ask for worksheets to be sent to me privately.

From the auditor I would want:

Process run.
Duration.
TA at start and end.
Cognitions.

Brief summary of what occurred in the session.

The way Tigerlily wrote up her last session is fine. Thank you.

I would also like any success stories from PCs detailing wins and life changes.

With regard to Super Power I would prefer that the PC not be asked to write up session experiences other than that. In running R3XD on Clears then any further write ups from PCs concerning their experiences are welcome.

Love,

Revenius